Abstract Primary implant stability arises from mechanical engagement at placement, and insertion torque is not a direct measure of osseointegration. This retrospective single-centre study included 101 MultiNeO titanium implant placements in 55 adults treated between April 2023 and January 2026. Four experienced operators placed implants subcrestally using a W&H Implantmed SI-1023, a bone-resistance-adapted drilling protocol, and a programmed target of 35 N·cm. Associations with recorded torque were assessed using a patient-clustered Gaussian generalized estimating equation adjusted for sex, age, anatomical sector, implant length and diameter, hard-tissue augmentation, and placement timing. The mean torque was 31.63 ± 5.57 N·cm; the median was 35 N·cm (Q1–Q3, 30–35). Recorded torque was 3.25 N·cm higher for implants placed in women than for those placed in men (95% CI 1.20–5.31; p = 0.002). Relative to maxillary anterior/premolar sites, mandibular molar sites showed higher torque (β = 4.02; p = 0.001), whereas mandibular anterior/premolar sites showed lower torque (β = −5.41; p = 0.013). Implant length had a modest adjusted association (β = 0.93 N·cm/mm; p = 0.022); age, diameter, augmentation, and placement timing did not. The concentration of recorded values at 35 N·cm reflects a clinical target rather than the device limit. These exploratory associations do not establish an intrinsic sex effect or predict osseointegration, and residual confounding due to unmeasured bone characteristics remains possible. Keywords: dental implants; insertion torque; primary stability; generalized estimating equations; MultiNeO; titanium alloy; anatomical site; retrospective cohort